Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 127
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 701
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 2,610
162% 2,610 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.2% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 77.5
65% 81.5 fps
MRender 88.4
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 93.3
72% 87.6 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1479 606 307 304 305 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2400
Write 1,878
Mixed 1,316
SusWrite 545
341% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 69.3
232% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 629
472% 631 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 230%
Great: 431%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
200GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 475 472 464 463 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 466
Mixed 443
SusWrite 470
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 50.4
166% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
999GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 107 103 108 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 16 17 20 24 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 20 25 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 805GB
699GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 17 20 25 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 21 51 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 62.2
MC Write 52.3
MC Mixed 44.5
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback