Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '16 at 02:42
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 95.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 465 62% 466 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 21 Parallax 27.3 18% 23.7 fps	MRender 28.8 Gravity 26.4 Splatting 24.8 22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 18%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 38.8 28% 34.9 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 40.7 Splatting 34.6 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8367 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1180 (B1) Unknown 93 93 74 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 48 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 65 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17821390799	70.5% Very good	Read 488 Write 345 Mixed 336 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 16.2 96% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 35.8 DQ Write 54.3 DQ Mixed 16.5 20% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 108%
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 19GB free Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7660 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1153 (AB) Unknown 80 80 18365776 (AE) Unknown 100 100 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 87 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3468 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5119 (F9) Unknown 100 100 362211335	68.8% Good	Read 376 Write 362 Mixed 364 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 16.2 76% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 15.1 62% 138 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 103%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 220GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 174 4066 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2708 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8865 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1495 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 142 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2565 (C2) HDA temperature 111 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.8% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 97.5 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.36 97% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 20.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 56.6 71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	396x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $722

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16