ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16L2

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GT62VR 6RE
Motherboard	MSI MS-16L2 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 522 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% MSI(1462 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.4 Reflection 120 Parallax 102 81% 107 fps	MRender 97.2 Gravity 93.8 Splatting 104 81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 640 648 646 636 552 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,879 Write 1,527 Mixed 705 SusWrite 657 265% 1,192 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 53.6 178% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 770 DQ Write 877 DQ Mixed 770 595% 806 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 254%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS2754D117-514 480GB 1,168 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 258GB free Firmware: CS211101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 394 416 424 420 423 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 348 Mixed 293 SusWrite 412 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 39.1 136% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 198 171% 252 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 04CD F4-2400C16-8GRS M471A1K43BB1-CRC 04CD F4-2400C16-8GRS 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.6% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 25.3 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 23.1 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-16L2 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 40%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-16L2

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	197x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	164x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	311x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	84x
GeForce GTX 1070NvidiaBench 80%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	56x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	37x
RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 256GBKingstonBench 79%, 7,907 samples	26x

RAM
MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 20,148 samples	86x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	37x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback