MSI MS-1782

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT72 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1782  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 147
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 490
46% 382 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M
MSI(1462 1157) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1352 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.4% Poor
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 47.9
9% 39.4 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 47
Splatting 55.8
45% 55.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$135
34GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 428 437 445 456 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 417
Mixed 378
SusWrite 439
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36.8
124% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 276
227% 325 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 119%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$135
40GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 428 437 431 246 202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 470
Mixed 390
SusWrite 360
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 36.6
123% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 269
224% 324 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 119%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 406 420 429 441 439 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 443
Mixed 369
SusWrite 420
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 40.8
143% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 305
242% 338 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$104
38GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 428 436 445 456 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 252
Mixed 386
SusWrite 440
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 37.6
126% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 278
228% 326 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Kingston 9905668-002.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.2
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1782 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1782

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback