Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300E5M/300E5L  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5M-KFWBR
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 270
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C784) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 6.5
6% 7.46 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 13.4
8% 8.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
549GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R4F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 83 92 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 32
SusWrite 89.8
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
319GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 33
Write 29.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 40.9
25% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15
0GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.9 5.2 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Read 19
Write 4.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 4.9
8% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback