HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180730
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '19 at 09:25
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 184 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 457 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200M 169 User benchmarks, average bench 17% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 18.9 17% 18.8 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 16.2 16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 299 298 300 291 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 450 Write 288 Mixed 296 SusWrite 290 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 26.6 96% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 231 203% 306 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 128%
Toshiba THNSNJ128GCSU 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 305GB free Firmware: JT000U SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 135 Write 137 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 113 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 223% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 500GB 5,329 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 243GB free Firmware: 060E SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 50 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 86.9 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 15.7 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	198x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	496x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16