Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 227
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 867
78% 660 Pts
64-Core 2328
144% 2328 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2345 2062 1457 1450 1450 1445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,616
Write 2,395
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 1,702
481% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 89.7
296% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 753
DQ Mixed 852
639% 856 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 339%
Great: 410%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
426GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 143 174 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 161
Mixed 20
SusWrite 162
91% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.2
115% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 94 88 112 123 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 127
Write 102
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 104
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 5.4
876% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M8Z2933C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 34.9
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 32.2
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback