ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2350A54

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 2350A54 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2350A54
Memory	29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '19 at 04:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 190 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 373 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M 4,288 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 557 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.42% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 9.38 7% 8.41 fps	MRender 9.86 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 11 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.42% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 256GB 2,468 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM77L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 333 343 347 341 351 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 451 Write 335 Mixed 274 SusWrite 333 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 27.5 106% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 146 119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 82%
SK hynix SC300 mSATA 512GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 161GB free Firmware: 20002P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 243 246 252 252 253 MB/s Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.4% Good	Read 262 Write 253 Mixed 235 SusWrite 241 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 32.8 116% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 174 134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 98%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75 5,635 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 178GB free Firmware: MH000C SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 83 82 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 78.8 Write 84.8 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 81.8 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 01BA 01BA 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 18.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 18.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback