Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory61 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 16:07
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 73.8
42% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 274
22% 193 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 33
21% 28.4 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 27
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 268 296 301 301 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48% Average
Read 298
Write 271
Mixed 156
SusWrite 291
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 14.9
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.5
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 22.1
24% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 48%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 268 301 305 306 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 318
Write 292
Mixed 271
SusWrite 296
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 25.8
82% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 45.1
38% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 134%
JMicron 500GB
293GB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 29.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 13.6
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 6.3
1,090% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
299GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 30.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 32.7
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
TrekStor DS maxi m.u 1TB
876GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 25.3
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
104GB free, PID a100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 20.6
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 12.1
25% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 44%
WD 5000AAK External 500GB
253GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 22.3
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 12
28% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 20%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
115GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 57 44 84 86 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 100
Write 5.7
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 72.4
57% 50 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron-002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 28.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 5.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback