Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 13:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 468
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1016 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 81.6
56% 69.9 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 75.6
55% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 206 209 211 211 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 420
Write 213
Mixed 362
SusWrite 218
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 41.9
149% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 210
180% 261 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
86GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 69
Write 67.8
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 58.9
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 4GB
2GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.3 3.8 3.2 3.2 3.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 14
Mixed 12
SusWrite 3.8
15% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback