Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9100 168 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 65.2 38% 56.4 Pts	4-Core 96.6 8-Core 68.9 12% 82.8 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 9,615 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3051) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.09 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GB 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 211 212 212 212 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.2% Above average	Read 219 Write 211 Mixed 194 SusWrite 210 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 36.6 111% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 77.4 DQ Mixed 41.9 36% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples	5x
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	3x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	6x
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	6x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16