Asrock ALiveXFire-eSATA2..

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock ALiveXFire-eSATA2..  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 59.6
31% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 36.2
8-Core 46.5
5% 41.3 Pts
64-Core 46.9
3% 46.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.65 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 164 124 113 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 228
Write 196
Mixed 143
SusWrite 128
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 6.8
34% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 35.7
30% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
203GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 72
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 71.5
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 21.2
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 12.3
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.3
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 65%
Toshiba USB 2.0 Ext. HDD 250GB
114GB free, PID 0b05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 18.7
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 12.7
22% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALiveXFire-eSATA2.. Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock ALiveXFire-eSATA2..

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback