TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 07:11
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 195
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 590
59% 480 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 79.6%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.02%
 Great: 1%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 198 229 217 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 359
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 214
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 43
146% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 191
170% 255 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 91%
 Great: 103%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 149 136 147 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 150
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 143
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 84.7%
 Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 14
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 54.9%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H81M-DS2V Builds (Compare 719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V - $51

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples86x
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples74x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples72x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples100x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples57x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples41x
SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples16x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples14x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples13x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples18x
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 3,888 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback