Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '15 at 17:07
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
92% 202 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 542
71% 534 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 22
Parallax 16.7
15% 19.1 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 22.1
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 489
Mixed 515
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 37
158% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 110
128% 225 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
886GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 179
Mixed 172
134% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.21
4K Write 2.91
4K Mixed 0.32
140% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MK4058GSX 400GB
237GB free
Firmware: FF01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 50
Mixed 49.4
38% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.25
64% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29%
Great: 35%
Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback