Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 04:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$300
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 92
2-Core 158
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 344
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 319
21% 319 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$265
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.9% Very good
Lighting 304
Reflection 241
Parallax 273
80% 273 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 270
Splatting 184
76% 225 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$69
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 153 152 150 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 208
Write 127
Mixed 156
SusWrite 150
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 35.8
127% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 117
91% 123 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 27 28 28 30 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 36.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 28.6
18% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 13%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
885GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 24 24 15 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 52
Write 132
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 23.8
41% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback