Asus M2N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2N  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070528
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 00:28
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 61.6
34% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 58.3
8-Core 61.1
8% 59.7 Pts
64-Core 62
4% 62 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.53
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 69
33% 55.6 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 68.9
57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 113 15 36 2.3 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.5% Very poor
Read 175
Write 143
Mixed 123
SusWrite 54.5
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 8.4
26% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
435GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 116 125 127 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 128
Write 92.9
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 119
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
677GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 33 37 29 32 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 46.6
Write 48.6
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 33.2
27% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 67%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID c96a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.8
Mixed 0.8
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback