Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 826
86% 689 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 174
Parallax 143
135% 161 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 196
Splatting 136
125% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 406 473 481 448 366 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 362
Mixed 252
SusWrite 418
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 43.6
155% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 345
257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
42GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 94 94 90 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 69.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 92.8
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
15GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 41
Write 41.7
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 41.3
54% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
46GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 42.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 42.3
51% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
5GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 26 32 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 30.6
42% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
9GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 53 52 53 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 71.3
Write 67.5
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 51.9
77% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 20.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $991
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback