Lenovo 9703A12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 9703A12  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080626
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '15 at 04:24
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7400-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 88.8
30% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 86.4
8-Core 89.5
12% 87.9 Pts
64-Core 88.2
6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Dell(1028 0342) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.25
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 248
Write 171
Mixed 174
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 19
105% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 39.4
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 17.4
21% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MK1246GSX 120GB
105GB free
Firmware: LB213A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 50.9
39% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.25
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback