HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 146A
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '16 at 02:19
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 100
45% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 150
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 146A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2189
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.97
1% 0.99 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 90GB-$242
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 56%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
28GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 19.1
Write 13.6
Mixed 15.5
20% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 3.01
4K Mixed 0.49
122% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PKI/Kingston 9905428-005.A02LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback