Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 186
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 582
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 10
11% 12.2 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 14.3
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 480GB-$129
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 92 225 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 465
Write 300
Mixed 384
SusWrite 123
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 44
146% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 241
198% 280 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback