Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180712
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 05:36
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 52.4 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 168 56% 102 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 626 58% 482 Pts	64-Core 1,615 100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 304A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 430 425 385 394 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 456 Write 446 Mixed 374 SusWrite 392 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 24.8 82% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 348 261% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 134%
LSI MR9265-8i 36TB 9.5TB free Firmware: 3.40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 1013 1020 1009 1021 999 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4 4 3.9 3.9 3.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 7 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 4.1 13% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.3 152% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C 4x16GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 20 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16