Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2123 2,702 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 185 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 602 56% 469 Pts	64-Core 621 38% 621 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 375.86 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Lighting 51.2 Reflection 56 Parallax 54 42% 53.7 fps	MRender 51.4 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 57.4 44% 52.9 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA71HAQ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,517 Write 514 Mixed 304 168% 778 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 19.4 82% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 446 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 616 448% 573 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 284%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 24GB 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.3% Good	MC Read 21 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 21.1 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 11 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	368x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	346x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	328x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	272x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	88x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16