Apple MacPro2,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Apple MacPro2,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F4208DC8
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '19 at 15:31
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355 426 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 30.9 2-Core 61.7 36% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 241 22% 182 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B E208) 3GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.6.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 25.4 Parallax 44.3 29% 35 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 34.7 Splatting 31.3 25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 709GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.00C09 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 29 49 53 52 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 99.5 Write 99.5 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 46.5 58% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 62%
WD WD1200BB-00RDA0 120GB 357 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 18GB free Firmware: 15.05R15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.72% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 15.3 Mixed 13 SusWrite 15.2 11% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.72% Great: 31%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 80GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 37 50 53 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 53.8 Write 53.8 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 48.5 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 8 slots used 12GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro2,1 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Apple MacPro2,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X53651stBench 44%, 504 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	13x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	9x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	6x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	5x

SSD
750 EVO 120GBSamsung $35Bench 93%, 20,420 samples	5x
128GB 128GBXraydiskBench 63%, 994 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	4x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	17x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	11x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16