Asus X550IU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8.06GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.06GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550IU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550IU
Memory4.3 GB free of 8.0625 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180330
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 11:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 111
51% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 209
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 14A0) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 9.96
Parallax 13.2
0% 7.73 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 7.17
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 60 62 61 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 75.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 61.2
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 8GB
2400, 2133 MHz
64, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550IU Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback