ADD TO PC
BUILD

NEC PC-VK18TGHDEOCG

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	NEC PC-VK18TGHDEOCG (all builds)
Motherboard	NEC MS-1391
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130313
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '19 at 09:59
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 10 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Micro-FCBGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 137 61% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 176 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 6005) 1.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.52% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 2.75 3% 4 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.61 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.52% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128 128GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 125 126 127 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 436 Write 133 Mixed 131 SusWrite 125 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 16.3 75% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 53.5 85% 169 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 64%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB 2,112 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 15.5 Write 1.2 6% 8.35 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4B4G0846B-HCK0 1x4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback