Asus K55A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K55A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55A
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 09:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 113
53% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 151
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 2102) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.01 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.61
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A/240G 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 81 78 77 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 453
Write 344
Mixed 353
SusWrite 111
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 13.4
64% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 72.8
122% 237 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
115GB free
Firmware: GG2OA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 59 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 57
Write 57.7
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 59.7
35% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55A Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback