HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 02:58
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 90.1
50% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 88.3
8-Core 87.7
12% 88 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.31
4% 4.38 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 49 59 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 64.5
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 56.7
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
1GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 17 17 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 15.5
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 15.9
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
K 9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback