Dell Precision T1700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T1700
MotherboardDell Precision T1700  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 511
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 1464 MHz, MLim: 1392 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.47
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 422 427 164 143 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 445
Write 412
Mixed 410
SusWrite 287
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 31.6
98% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 328
246% 328 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81%
Great: 100%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
236GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 309 327 328 317 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 415
Write 195
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 324
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 11.2
44% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 19.3
16% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD03EU1276M Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1700 Builds (Compare 2,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback