Asrock Z87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 09:14
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 211
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 535
58% 463 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 79.2
52% 70.1 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 55.3
49% 61 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 128 128 123 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 447
Write 205
Mixed 216
SusWrite 129
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 36
146% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 113
113% 187 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 110%
Intenso SATA III SSD 480GB
184GB free
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 373 52 100 99 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 261
Write 106
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 186
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 10.9
52% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
183GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 65 70 65 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 46.3
Write 32
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 65.3
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32%
Great: 63%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB
29GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.8 6.6 7.2 7.2 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Read 15
Write 6.7
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 6.2
8% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Pro4 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback