Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 108 53% 83.6 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 190 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 16.1 15% 17 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 16.4 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Q-180 180GB 748 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180731 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 250 46 36 43 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 299 Write 160 Mixed 250 SusWrite 107 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 16.8 65% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 47.2 DQ Mixed 26.8 23% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 139GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 81 80 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 163 Write 169 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 79.3 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 109%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 4GB free Firmware: KF100-06 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 76.7 Write 78.5 Mixed 49.5 51% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 53%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 99GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 81 80 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 92 Mixed 72 SusWrite 79.1 64% 86 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 16.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 11.9 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16