Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Huananzhi X58-RX3.0 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180619
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '19 at 15:59
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 162 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 451 47% 376 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37 32% 35.6 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 35.9 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 93 50 50 50 51 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.9% Above average	Read 256 Write 221 Mixed 207 SusWrite 83.1 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 24 95% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 140 120% 177 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 87%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 778GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 338 343 338 337 341 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 MXIC 25L3205 52GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.4% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	28x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	18x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
TB 240GB SSDAnacomdaBench 67%, 45 samples	5x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBSamsungBench 41%, 54 samples	11x
Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBUnknownBench 34%, 41 samples	5x
M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBSamsungBench 42%, 25 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16