Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 02:56
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 763
84% 666 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 178
Parallax 159
134% 167 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 177
Splatting 123
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
49GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 473 484 495 440 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 419
SusWrite 410
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 66.8
230% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,180
Write 1,243
Mixed 575
291% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 53.8
256% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,047
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 999
764% 1,032 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265
1TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 473 484 495 495 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 497
Mixed 444
SusWrite 482
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 68.6
231% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 364
274% 365 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 138%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270MX-Gaming5 Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback