MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 157
2-Core 316
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 787
91% 707 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2209 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 119
Parallax 103
75% 105 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 101
Splatting 107
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 353
Write 258
Mixed 228
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 37
144% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 176
159% 240 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 87%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
110GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 298 284 261 246 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 306
Mixed 288
SusWrite 269
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 40.9
167% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 245
211% 313 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2533 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback