Asus H310M-C/HDMI

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H310M-C/HDMI (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180322
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '19 at 05:07
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 224 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 334 42% 321 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.15% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 7.03 5% 6.92 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 0.13 2% 2.24 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.15% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3790) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Lighting 96.7 Reflection 86.4 Parallax 76.1 79% 86.4 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 79.4 Splatting 77.3 62% 75.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB 7,894 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 166 340 390 323 326 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 453 Mixed 388 SusWrite 297 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 38.7 138% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 199 185% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 131 134 135 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 154 Write 138 Mixed 94 SusWrite 133 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-C/HDMI Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H310M-C/HDMI

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	3x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	3x
Core i5-8500Intel $174Bench 82%, 43,089 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $221Bench 72%, 10,770 samples	1x
SSD 240GBTammuzBench 58%, 192 samples	1x
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	1x

RAM
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,772 samples	2x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	1x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $453

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16