| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision M6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130605 |
| Uptime | 1.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 06 '19 at 23:32 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | TWN-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
49.8%
Average
|
42% 61.4 Pts
|
18% 130 Pts
|
8% 128 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M
Dell(1028 019C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
|
5.93%
Terrible
|
6% 5.97 fps
|
5% 5.91 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 172 176 174 170 177 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
29% 127 MB/s
|
49% 16.1 MB/s
|
22% 33.4 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
125GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 121 124 113 115 114 MB/s
|
29.5%
Poor
|
26% 117 MB/s
|
51% 16.2 MB/s
|
26% 33.7 MB/s
|
|
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
214GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 149 174 172 177 MB/s
|
29.5%
Poor
|
41% 181 MB/s
|
34% 12.6 MB/s
|
19% 29.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.8%
Very poor
|
17% 6.03 GB/s
|
16% 5.77 GB/s
|
46% 85.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M6400 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $172Bench 46%, 660 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 30x |
| Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 20x |
| FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $365 |