Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 12:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 239
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 346
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 6.53
6% 7.71 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 6
Splatting 14.2
9% 9.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 7.1 19 30 41 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 402
Write 52.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 31.3
29% 135 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 17.9
62% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 40.5
45% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
528GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 179 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 181
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 181
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 04CB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 22.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback