Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 01:13
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 948
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,357
84% 1,357 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2094 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 121
Parallax 109
87% 112 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 102
Splatting 107
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 251 316 326 326 325 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 1,508
Mixed 566
SusWrite 350
239% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 46.3
168% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 596
486% 695 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 182%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 240GB
133GB free
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 194 182 189 189 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 398
Write 275
Mixed 300
SusWrite 189
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 26.5
91% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 103
102% 156 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA THNS512G 512GB
334GB free
Firmware: AGYA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 164 173 175 177 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Read 160
Write 137
Mixed 122
SusWrite 173
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 10.2
48% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 9
11% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 34%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB
256GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 349 179 189 69 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 180
Write 103
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 207
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 19.1
54% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 84.5
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 92.3
95% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EADS-00M 1TB
94GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 79
Write 28.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 25.8
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3000C15 Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMK16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2746, 2746, 2746, 2746 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 32
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback