Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '19 at 00:53
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	54%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 89.5 49% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 146 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.8% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 19.8 Parallax 22.7 21% 22.7 fps	MRender 22.9 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 23.7 20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-120 120GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0725A SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 136 138 138 139 136 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 370 Write 128 Mixed 141 SusWrite 136 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 8.3 57% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 56.3 62% 104 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 72%
MT-128 128GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free Firmware: 1.98.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 189 212 221 194 242 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 175 Write 92.7 Mixed 95.3 SusWrite 214 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 9.5 37% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 65.7 DQ Write 97.6 DQ Mixed 106 74% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 91%
Toshiba MG03ACA200 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1.5TB free Firmware: FL1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 151 154 153 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 146 Write 148 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 151 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.8 4.2 7.2 8.4 7.2 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.81% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 25.8 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 5.8 18% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 14% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.81% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	869x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	645x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	439x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	160x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	120x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	84x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	55x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16