HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81DF
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 17:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 121
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 171
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 84 109 102 78 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 88.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 97.3
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD50 00LPVT-08G33T1 500GB
147GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 22.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 22.8
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.4 8.1 8.5 7.9 8.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 8.8
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 8.6
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback