Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120820
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 180 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 333 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.59% Terrible	Lighting 9.73 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 7.72 8% 9.77 fps	MRender 9.05 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 14.7 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.59% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.28.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 124 122 124 107 93 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 239 Write 136 Mixed 175 SusWrite 112 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 23.9 87% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 32.1 35% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 451GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 78 75 78 77 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 72.5 Write 78 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 74.7 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 121GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 62 62 57 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 56.8 Write 51 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 60.8 66% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 27% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 46%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 78GB free, PID 0c15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 32 Write 26.3 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 27.5 37% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.8 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	161x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	122x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359