HP hp workstation xw6200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP hp workstation xw6200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory1.8 GB free of 8.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 06:16
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 36.1
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 34.7
22% 32.7 Pts
4-Core 47
8-Core 49.1
6% 48 Pts
64-Core 50.9
3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 22%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300 GE
Device(107D 5A96) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.19
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.14
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 16 16 16 13 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 16.2
Mixed 11.6
SusWrite 18.5
11% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 88%
USB DISK Pro 16GB
2GB free, PID 3e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 0.9
6% 6.03 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33280 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.15% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback