HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 158 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 368 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.67 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 2 2% 2.54 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 149 62 87 72 64 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 198 Write 186 Mixed 26 SusWrite 106 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 3.6 33% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 70.4 DQ Mixed 14.6 21% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 100%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 875GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 137 142 141 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 140 Write 146 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 139 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 84%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 21.3 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 18.6 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 49%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 509GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.25% Terrible	Read 27.6 Write 15.6 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 17.9 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:00 00 44GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.1% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	198x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	159x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	99x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	11x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16