Packard imedia XS N3610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemPackard imedia XS N3610  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FMCP7A-ION
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20091103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '16 at 17:11
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom 330
Intel , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Memory 44.1
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 19.1
19% 24.6 Pts
4-Core 32.7
8-Core 32.6
4% 32.7 Pts
64-Core 33.2
2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia ION
Acer(1025 0222) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.1
1% 2.97 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.5
1% 2.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 8.27
Write 80.7
Mixed 4.03
22% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.29
67% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 45%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB
0GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 19.6
Write 14.8
Mixed 14.9
20% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.35
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.29
121% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback