EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory43.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 13:53
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 69
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 176
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 679
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,316
81% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6799) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 142
Parallax 131
65% 118 fps
Gravity 199
Splatting 132
142% 165 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
902GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 324 325 323 323 325 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 370
Write 326
Mixed 306
SusWrite 324
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 35.8
121% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 229
160% 203 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 105%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 25 17 28 48 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 33.9
Mixed 14.6
SusWrite 32.6
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 76%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB
69GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 29 19 30 52 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 62.2
Write 29.8
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 35.2
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28%
Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
516GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 108 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 107
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 65%
Maxtor 7H500F0 500GB-$50
299GB free
Firmware: HA431DN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 64.3
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 61.7
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.1
146% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 38%
Marvell Raid VD 0 1TB
674GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 185 188 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 254
Write 188
Mixed 105
SusWrite 186
134% 183 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.5
384% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 127%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL... 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback