HP ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory24.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 22:56
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 726
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 38
33% 37 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 35.7
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dierya 120GB 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 21 19 19 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 464
Write 45.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 18.6
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 4.1
43% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 8.9
34% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 126GB
69GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 73 71 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 409
Write 323
Mixed 252
SusWrite 112
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 4.9
68% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 83.4
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 16.8
48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 126GB
117GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 167 167 167 167 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 28GB
2400, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: HP ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback