Medion X782X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion X782X  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION X782X
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 179
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 447
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10E8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 5.78
3% 5.33 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.48
4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 175 167 170 165 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 404
Write 219
Mixed 303
SusWrite 173
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 28.4
101% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 230
190% 274 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
587GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 125 124 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 114
Mixed 29
SusWrite 124
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB KHX1600C9S3L/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X782X Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion X782X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback