Asus M51BC

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	May 31 '19 at 20:08
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 117 56% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 335 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6676) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 89.2 Reflection 99.6 Parallax 77.6 73% 88.8 fps	MRender 97 Gravity 104 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 411 416 435 361 261 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 393 Mixed 375 SusWrite 380 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 42.7 142% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 257 194% 259 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 124%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MKAOA8P0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 139 141 140 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 136 Write 142 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 140 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G3D21BCE1.16FN 4x8GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.2% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 16.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 12.4 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	98x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	13x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 12GBAdataBench 41%, 68 samples	8x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $307

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16