Lenovo 10110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10110  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 06:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330S
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 151
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 279
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 615
Legend(17AA 366C) 2GB
CLim: 935 MHz, MLim: 567 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3.04
3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 142 170 181 181 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 174
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 165
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
592GB free
Firmware: 0835
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 80.4
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10110 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback