Asus SABERTOOTH Z87

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z87  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 01:19
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 195
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 595
60% 489 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 54.6
33% 41.7 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 40
Splatting 36.5
29% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 375 318 305 319 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 438
Mixed 344
SusWrite 346
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.6
192% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
112GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 190 200 201 192 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 336
Write 264
Mixed 255
SusWrite 198
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 40.1
147% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 224
178% 248 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
618GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 170 171 171 172 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 130
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 170
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 114%
Generic Flash HS-COMBO 4GB
4GB free, PID 2228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 9.7
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 10.1
14% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z87 Builds (Compare 1,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z87 - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $685
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback