MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 703
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2177 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 117
Parallax 99.4
91% 110 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 101
Splatting 104
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 286 266 278 214 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 475
Mixed 411
SusWrite 259
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 349
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
112GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 467 468 480 481 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 458
Mixed 402
SusWrite 466
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 66
223% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 85.4
112% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback